Tired or Paranoid Looking
Richard Page 'What We Already Know' - Ffotogallery 2007
Review by Jesse Alexander

Source - Issue 50 - Spring - 2007 - Click for Contents

Issue 50 Spring 2007
View Contents ▸

Anyone who has had the opportunity to play with a large-format camera will have noticed, and probably have been extremely vexed by, the difficulty of correctly focusing the image that falls (upside-down) on the ground-glass plate. This is due to two factors: the necessarily long focal lengths of large-format camera lenses (which have a relatively shallow depth-of-field), and the physical flexibility of the lens and film mounts, the positioning of which determines what is in focus, depending on the perspective of the subject to the camera. Correct adjustment should lead to perfectly vertical subjects and pin sharp images every time. However, a growing list of practitioners, including Miklos Gaál, Olivo Barbieri and Jean-Luc Mylayne have exploited these movements (most commonly by tilting the film mount) to throw all but a small selection of the composition out of focus. It is quite understandable that many people see this technique as little more than a gimmick; Gaál himself has been candid enough to admit this, and goes on to divulge that his work was the result of not knowing how to operate the camera properly. This visual method leads to two very identifiable visual connotations within these practitioners' work, both of which are also explored in Richard Page's series What We Already Know.

This exhibition is a culmination of several years' worth of material, bits of which were included in the Jerwood Award 2004 exhibition and, also in 2004, alongside a series by Andy Lock's in Twenty Shadows (reviewed in Source 39). Page is typically drawn to prosaic locations such as office buildings, business parks and modern suburban houses; places that are very much within the current photographic vogue for generic utilitarian spaces and sites on the peripheries of cities - what Marc Augé would describe as 'non-places'. Needless to say, Page does not reference the actual locations in the photographs.The Wrong Location, 2005 - Courtesy FfotogalleryThe Wrong Location, 2005 - Courtesy Ffotogallery

Page is attempting to impose a sense of malevolence upon these quite ordinary sites, and this is achieved effortlessly by these dramatic shifts in focus. It is a simple case of fearing what you can't quite see: what could be lurking in the misty, out-of-focus spots of Page's mise-en-scènes? And also, paradoxically, by what you can see: the line of sharp focus through the composition reminds me of my eyes playing tricks on me when I'm walking late at night, my attention being arrested by anything that moves or resembles a human figure. And as with tired or paranoid looking, Page's choice of focal plane or particular object within the image, often seems arbitrary.

In the introductory essay, Mark Bolland places Page with the likes of Gregory Crewdson, describing them as 'purveyors of suburban spookiness', and cites their visual origins in B-movies and TV crime thrillers (although Page's aesthetic is much more along the lines of the likes of Prime Suspect and Taggart). One image in particular, Suburban Exposure #2 (2003), which shows a footpath with two generic, Barratt-style homes in the background and looks like it could back onto a railway embankment, depicts just the sort of place to find a dead body; one can easily imagine the blue and white police tape restricting access to an, in any case, rarely used public right-of-way.

However, the crimes and dangers that Page is hinting at in this work are not street crime or violent assault. He is almost suggesting suburbia as a battleground of the War on Terror. The deliberate sense of paranoia within his images is a reflection of our wider, so-called 'climate of fear', which warns us to be on guard for anything at all, perhaps even a car covered by a tarpaulin (Suburban Exposure #4), a pay-phone (The Wrong Location), or an abandoned computer monitor (Human Resources #1). This isn't so ridiculous if we consider how simple objects such as bins, rucksacks and now hair peroxide have become a sign of an enemy that is largely invisible. Whether deliberately or not, the title of the exhibition references Donald Rumsfeld's famously nonsensical news briefing about 'known knowns' and 'unknown unknowns' regarding US intelligence before the invasion of Iraq (2nd February, 2002).

The most obvious reading of these types of images is that the viewer is pressed up against perfect miniature models. Paul Winch-Furness, another graduate of the University of Westminster and also a winner of the Jerwood Photography Award (2006) applied this method to transform areas of Milton Keynes - a town created as a whole - back into an architect's model. This miniaturising effect does enhance a sense of observation and scrutiny which is relevant to Page's work, but this effect has been seen before, and more appropriately, particularly in Tom Merilion's aerial photographs of Birmingham and Marc Räder's series of a gated community in California.

Although Page's technique is not original, and the locations in his images are somewhat clichéd, I could not help enjoying the series, particularly as his hand-printed duratrans and self-made light-boxes have an enchanting quality to them. Their installation, in terms of individual size and juxtaposition, seems to benefit from being less uniform than usual. It will be interesting to observe whether any practitioner can employ this technique originally, without being suggestive of the model diorama or generic malevolence.

Other articles by Jesse Alexander:

Other articles on photography from the 'Urban' category ▸