Privacy Note: Source uses cookies or similar technologies to analyze trends, administer the website, track users’ movement around the website and to gather demographic information about our user base as a whole. The technology used to collect information automatically from Source Users may include cookies, web beacons, and embedded scripts. In addition, we and our analytics providers (such as Google), and service providers (such as PayPal and Mailchimp) may use a variety of other technologies that collect similar information for security and fraud detection purposes and we may use third parties to perform these services on our behalf. If you continue to use this site, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device. 

Source Photographic Review - Back Issue Archive - Issue 77 Winter 2013 - Editorial Page

Issue 77 — Winter 2013

Source - Issue 77 - Winter - 2013 - Click for Contents

Issue 77 — Winter  2013
View Contents ▸

Photography is typically considered as a documentary medium because of its connection with the world. It might equally be considered an abstract medium for the same reason. One arena in which this is particularly evident is in the long running and painstaking efforts made to get computers to interpret photographic images. The summit of achievement in this area so far is getting computers to recognise cats on Youtube. Adrian Li sets out the steps a computer has to go through to move from receiving undifferentiated pixels to even the most basic interpretation of a photograph.

A computer translates an image into a grid of pixel intensities to allow its interpretation. To make a photograph available for a blind person to experience, a similar translation is undergone into a tactile image. Sue King from the Royal National Institute for the Blind explains to Richard West how they adapt a photograph into a texture and how the experience of an image by touch differs from experiencing the same image by looking.

An interest in philosophical questions about how things become intelligible to human beings is shared by the artists in this issue. Darren Harvey-Regan is interested in exploring the way in which things appear and come to make sense in the world. In Metalepsis, what at first appear to be simply pictures of rocks, on closer inspection turn out to be a form of commentary that we are invited to interpret. Why, for example, does the stone appear to cast a shadow on itself? As Siún Hanrahan explains, 'metalepsis' is a type of rhetoric: "a form is used figuratively and taken through a succession of its different meanings or incarnations so as to broach questions regarding the nature of likeness. What is it for two things to be alike, to partake of the same idea? And what is it for something to be more or less truthful, more or less like the world?"

We first published Becky Beasley's work in 2003 (Source 37), in this issue we are publishing a new series of images from her work Spring Rain. The title refers to a story by Malamud, the first clue that, as Regan's work is about more than rocks, Beasley is concerned with more than just cucumbers; although that's what the pictures show. The cucumbers are suggestively comic, obscene and erotic but, as Matt Packer describes, also part of a story that is both personal and literary in origin.

David Penny's Fragments, Monoliths & Portals continues his work in the still life genre. Penny is interested in how 'through the action of photographing an object or assemblage it can be transformed through this mechanical process, which although is likely to be a straightforward document; at the same time, has the potential to produce or perform something entirely imaginary'. Gavin Murphy introduces the work making connections with spiritual exercises in which 'a prolonged scrutiny of everyday forms should lead to an exalted imaginative realm'.

— The Editors